![]() ![]() What are HFCs and why are they so bad?Īccording to Greenpeace, HFCs were developed as a replacement for chlorinated fluorocarbons (CFCs) that were banned in 1992 by the Montreal Protocol. The Act will stimulate a new wave in US innovation as companies ramp up to locate and produce replacements even more efficient than the HFCs they are replacing. With the EPA tasked to facilitate the next generation of HFC replacements, the onus is on the American manufacturing sector to innovate next-generation products. The “innovation” part of the Act is also beneficial. Provide a savings to US consumers of $3.7 billion over fifteen years.Reduce the US/foreign trade deficit in chemicals and equipment by $12.5 billion.Add $39 billion to the US manufacturing output over seven years.Accelerated degradation of coral reefs and damage to the marine ecosystem.An increase in sea level that displaces people and consumes coastline.Rainstorms that are a third more intense with more damaging flooding.Heat waves to last a third longer damaging crops and aiding wildfires.A half a degree may sound inconsequential, but NASA states that even this very small increase can cause: From a climate change perspective, it is believed that AIM will help the planet avoid an increase of. The Act jointly addresses climate change and job creation. The AIM Act received bi-partisan support as well as support from industry. This act specifically identifies HFCs because their global warming potential is thousands-in some cases, tens of thousands-times more damaging than carbon dioxide. HFCs are powerful greenhouse gases that are contributing to global warming. ![]() The AIM Act directly affects companies that produce and/or use HFCs in the following industries:Ī primary purpose of the AIM Act is to reduce the release of HFCs into the environment. #AIM MEANING FREE#
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |